-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lto: enabling lto at configure #21677
Conversation
Note for anyone landing this: Subsystem should be @octaviansoldea If you want to amend the commit message for that, it will save someone a few keystrokes later on. |
This modification allows for compiling with link time optimization (lto) using the flag --enable-lto. Refs: nodejs#7400
Hello Thank you for the comment. I will update the commit asap. |
53f94ec
to
9aa749f
Compare
Hello Thank you again for the comment. I have updated the label with amending. I am more than happy to receive feedback and comments. |
configure
Outdated
for compiler in [(CC, 'c'), (CXX, 'c++')]: | ||
ok, is_clang, clang_version, compiler_version = \ | ||
try_check_compiler(compiler[0], compiler[1]) | ||
if is_clang or compiler_version < version_checked: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
String-based version range checking like this is not foolproof, for example: '10.0.0' < '5.4.1'
will evaluate to True
. At the very least we would need a version comparison function that simply splits on '.' and compares each integer value between two version strings.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or do a tuple comparison, e.g.,
Line 727 in 0a78f7d
elif clang_version < (3, 4, 2) if is_clang else gcc_version < (4, 9, 4): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This commit is a refactoring for testing that the compilers used for lto are gcc and g++ only.
Dear Reviewers, Thank you for your valuable comments and feedback. I have implemented the suggested modifications. However, I would like to point out an issue I believe it is a problem to be addressed. The calls ok, is_clang, clang_version, gcc_version = try_check_compiler(CXX, 'c++') and ok, is_clang, clang_version, gcc_version = try_check_compiler(CC, 'c') return clang_version and gcc_version as tuple of strings. This means, most probably, the subsequent tests ... are a bit strange. Could you please tell if you want that I open a separate issue on this? Thank you for valuable comments and feedback again. |
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/15788/ Whoever lands this: Please be reminded to change the subsystem label to |
Dear Reviewers I saw that "node-test-commit — tests failed". Could you please tell if is there anything I am supposed to do? Thank you in advance, |
@octaviansoldea ... looks like an unrelated flaky failure. I'm running that one OSX test again: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-osx/19766/ If that comes back green we should be able to land. |
Landed in 32cad73, thanks for the PR! 🎉 |
@octaviansoldea Is it correct that this PR does not enable Link Time Optimization by default? If so, is that the goal in the future and is there already a PR/issue where we can track that change/discussion? |
This modification allows for compiling with link time optimization (lto) using the flag --enable-lto.
Refs: #7400
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesThis is a modification proposed towards enabling lto compilation. From some preliminary results, I observed that there are no major changes in performance when running Node-DC-EIS. However, when coupling lto with pgo, see also Refs: #21583, I observed improvements of even more than 10% in Node-DC-EIS.
The proposed solution, when enabling lto, manifests a test failure, which seems to be not very critical. In this context, please see comments and feedback from @addaleax at Refs: #7400.
The experiments were done on
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8180 CPU @ 2.50GHz
and
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz.