Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: switch strictEqual parameters - actual first before expected #23537

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

test: switch strictEqual parameters - actual first before expected #23537

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

chrisbautista
Copy link
Contributor

test: switch strictEqual parameters - actual first before expected

In the documentation, assert.strictEqual() the actual comes before the expected value.
This commit fixes test/pummel/test-exec.js to keep consistent with the documentation.
Reference: https://nodejs.org/api/assert.html#assert_assert_strictequal_actual_expected_message

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Oct 12, 2018
@targos targos added the code-and-learn Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events. label Oct 12, 2018
BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2018
PR-URL: nodejs#23537
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2018
PR-URL: nodejs#23537
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

Landed in 9631190 🎉

@BridgeAR BridgeAR closed this Oct 15, 2018
jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2018
PR-URL: #23537
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2018
PR-URL: #23537
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2018
PR-URL: #23537
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2018
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2018
PR-URL: #23537
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2018
PR-URL: #23537
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
code-and-learn Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants