Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
embedding: refactor NewIsolate() #26525
embedding: refactor NewIsolate() #26525
Changes from 4 commits
0a24ee1
8a0ff6c
ff05c1a
0f26254
45e1f65
30d1e83
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it make sense to have a
NewIsolate
constructor that takes only theevent_loop
, and builds one from the default allocator?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How would we transfer ownership of the allocator in that case?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
like, say for example a class of embedder is not interested in creating or managing an allocator, so not interested in its ownership?
furthermore, do we have a guidance (or user data) that suggests the desired / recommended level of
embedding
node? With these items (v8, uv loop, allocator, isolate, env, inspector and probably more) that can be custom-created or delegated, what level of control we foresee to give to embedders, and what to keep within node?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(I should admit that I don't have insight on this, and did not work with any embedding users that had reported issues or improvements in this area)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I mean, I understand why you asked, I just don’t see how we could technically realize this without significant complexity (or maybe at all)? And the embedder would likely okay be okay with maintaining a reference to the allocator, because it has to do that for the
Isolate
already and can use the same code paths for that.Yeah, it’s a bit difficult to tell where to draw the line. I’d prefer to give embedders more control though if in doubt, because they might need it (for example, Electron hooks into Node’s internals a lot and it would be great to make that unnecessary).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, thanks for the explanation, make sense to me!