Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

doc: add code example to process.throwDeprecation property #29495

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

doc: add code example to process.throwDeprecation property #29495

Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
a7521d5
doc: add code example to process.throwDeprecation property
juanarbol Sep 8, 2019
52b7711
fixup
juanarbol Sep 12, 2019
bf3bcf7
fixup
juanarbol Sep 19, 2019
a6d19ba
fixup
juanarbol Sep 23, 2019
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
25 changes: 21 additions & 4 deletions doc/api/process.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2222,11 +2222,28 @@ added: v0.9.12

* {boolean}

The `process.throwDeprecation` property indicates whether the
`--throw-deprecation` flag is set on the current Node.js process. See the
The initial value of `process.throwDeprecation` indicates whether the
`--throw-deprecation` flag is set on the current Node.js process,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
`--throw-deprecation` flag is set on the current Node.js process,
`--throw-deprecation` flag is set on the current Node.js process.

`process.throwDeprecation` is mutable, so whether or not deprecation
warnings results in an error may be altered at runtime. See the
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
warnings results in an error may be altered at runtime. See the
warnings result in errors may be altered at runtime. See the

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Trott, Thanks! Fixed on a6d19ba

documentation for the [`'warning'` event][process_warning] and the
[`emitWarning()` method][process_emit_warning] for more information about this
flag's behavior.
[`emitWarning()` method][process_emit_warning] for more information.

```console
$ node --throw-deprecation -p "process.throwDeprecation"
true
$ node -p "process.throwDeprecation"
undefined
$ node
> process.emitWarning('test', 'DeprecationWarning');
undefined
> (node:26598) DeprecationWarning: test
> process.throwDeprecation = true;
true
> process.emitWarning('test', 'DeprecationWarning');
Thrown:
{ [DeprecationWarning: test] name: 'DeprecationWarning' }
```
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It may be worthwhile to include an example that shows process.throwDeprecation is mutable at runtime...

process.throwDeprecation = true;

process.emitWarning('test', 'DeprecationWarning');
// will cause an error to be thrown

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Totally worth it!

Copy link
Member Author

@juanarbol juanarbol Sep 11, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should docs change? I mean, may say that process. throwDeprecation is mutable at runtime like: "The process.throwDeprecation is a mutable property at runtime which indicates...". And of course, add your example

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would be good, I think


## process.title
<!-- YAML
Expand Down