-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fs: make FSStatWatcher.start private #29971
Conversation
Unfortunately I think this will require a deprecation cycle before it can be made private |
That should have included a deprecation also. I hadn't seen it before it landed |
I see that new deprecation PR, #29989, for the |
There seems to be some discussion happening in this issue, #29989 (comment), regarding the needing a deprecation or not, so going to wait to see what happens there before proceeding |
It looks like the outcome of #29989 (comment) , was that it is prefered to have an alias or stub than a runtime deprecation for this type of thing. I'm going to update this PR then to do that |
Updated this PR with the stubbed out start method |
38b9f56
to
c2ec954
Compare
Also gave this a rebase since it was out of date |
also adding in a comment, which was suggested here: #30160 (review) I also realize i have a 2 different PR's open for the same file, sorry about that :) |
An instance of FSStatWatcher is returned when a user calls fs.watchFile, which will call the start method. A user can't create an instance of a FSStatWatcher directly. If the start method is called by a user it is a noop since the watcher has already started. This "Class" is currently undocumented
442c5be
to
7e03961
Compare
Just did a rebase now that #30160 has been merged |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the ping!
This needs another @nodejs/tsc approval in order to land |
An instance of FSStatWatcher is returned when a user calls fs.watchFile, which will call the start method. A user can't create an instance of a FSStatWatcher directly. If the start method is called by a user it is a noop since the watcher has already started. This "Class" is currently undocumented. PR-URL: #29971 Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Landed in 535e957 🎉 |
Similar to #29905
An instance of FSStatWatcher is returned when a user calls fs.watchFile,
which will call the start method. A user can't create an instance
of a FSStatWatcher directly. If the start method is called by a user
it is a noop since the watcher has already started.
ATM, a user could call start on a closed watcher and i believe it would restart it, however, they would need to re-pass the filename and other function parameters. I haven't actually tested that out, though. This is what i see from the code. It would be nice if it acted in a similar fashion to the FSWatch class, and a noop would happen if start was called on a closed watcher, but if this function becomes private, then that wouldn't matter
This method is also undocumented, in fact, the whole "Class" FSStatWatcher seems to be undocumented, although that can be a different issue/PR
This PR makes this method private, and would be a semver-major change, similar to the link issue above
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes