-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
src: wrap HostPort in ExclusiveAccess #31717
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot
added
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
lib / src
Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory.
labels
Feb 10, 2020
jasnell
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2020
cjihrig
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2020
addaleax
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2020
tniessen
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2020
devnexen
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2020
Similar to Rust's `std::sync::Mutex` in that it requires one to unwrap the object before accessing it, acquiring the mutex in the process.
I found it exceedingly hard to figure out if there is a race condition where one thread reads the inspector agent's HostPort's properties while another modifies them concurrently. I think the answer is "no, there isn't" but with this commit use sites are forced to unwrap the object (and acquire the mutex in the process), making it a great deal easier to reason about correctness.
bnoordhuis
force-pushed
the
exclusive-access
branch
from
February 13, 2020 15:37
24ef127
to
18b5694
Compare
addaleax
added
the
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
label
Feb 13, 2020
Landed in d63bcdd...303e2fd |
addaleax
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2020
Similar to Rust's `std::sync::Mutex` in that it requires one to unwrap the object before accessing it, acquiring the mutex in the process. PR-URL: #31717 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
addaleax
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2020
I found it exceedingly hard to figure out if there is a race condition where one thread reads the inspector agent's HostPort's properties while another modifies them concurrently. I think the answer is "no, there isn't" but with this commit use sites are forced to unwrap the object (and acquire the mutex in the process), making it a great deal easier to reason about correctness. PR-URL: #31717 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2020
Similar to Rust's `std::sync::Mutex` in that it requires one to unwrap the object before accessing it, acquiring the mutex in the process. PR-URL: #31717 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2020
I found it exceedingly hard to figure out if there is a race condition where one thread reads the inspector agent's HostPort's properties while another modifies them concurrently. I think the answer is "no, there isn't" but with this commit use sites are forced to unwrap the object (and acquire the mutex in the process), making it a great deal easier to reason about correctness. PR-URL: #31717 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Merged
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2020
Similar to Rust's `std::sync::Mutex` in that it requires one to unwrap the object before accessing it, acquiring the mutex in the process. PR-URL: #31717 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2020
I found it exceedingly hard to figure out if there is a race condition where one thread reads the inspector agent's HostPort's properties while another modifies them concurrently. I think the answer is "no, there isn't" but with this commit use sites are forced to unwrap the object (and acquire the mutex in the process), making it a great deal easier to reason about correctness. PR-URL: #31717 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2020
Similar to Rust's `std::sync::Mutex` in that it requires one to unwrap the object before accessing it, acquiring the mutex in the process. PR-URL: #31717 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2020
I found it exceedingly hard to figure out if there is a race condition where one thread reads the inspector agent's HostPort's properties while another modifies them concurrently. I think the answer is "no, there isn't" but with this commit use sites are forced to unwrap the object (and acquire the mutex in the process), making it a great deal easier to reason about correctness. PR-URL: #31717 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Merged
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2020
Similar to Rust's `std::sync::Mutex` in that it requires one to unwrap the object before accessing it, acquiring the mutex in the process. PR-URL: #31717 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2020
I found it exceedingly hard to figure out if there is a race condition where one thread reads the inspector agent's HostPort's properties while another modifies them concurrently. I think the answer is "no, there isn't" but with this commit use sites are forced to unwrap the object (and acquire the mutex in the process), making it a great deal easier to reason about correctness. PR-URL: #31717 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
2 tasks
codebytere
added a commit
to electron/electron
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2020
codebytere
added a commit
to electron/electron
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
lib / src
Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I found it exceedingly hard to figure out if there is a race condition
where one thread reads the inspector agent's HostPort's properties while
another modifies them concurrently.
I think the answer is "no, there isn't" but with this commit use sites
are forced to unwrap the object (and acquire the mutex in the process),
making it a great deal easier to reason about correctness.
(The first commit introduces said
ExclusiveAccess
class.)