Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: move buffer-as-path symlink test to its own test file #34569

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Jul 30, 2020

The buffer-as-path test for fs.symlinkSync() is a bit unusual and
potentially error-prone embedded in the general fs.symlink() test. Move
it to its own test file.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34540/files#r463168354

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Jul 30, 2020
// NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM,
// DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR
// OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE
// USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
Copy link
Member Author

@Trott Trott Jul 30, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't usually include the Joyent copyright in newly-written tests but this one was substantially copied from test-fs-symlink.js so the copyright is included.

@Trott Trott mentioned this pull request Jul 30, 2020
3 tasks
@mmarchini mmarchini added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 31, 2020
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Aug 1, 2020

@nodejs/testing

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 1, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented Aug 1, 2020

@Trott Trott added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Aug 1, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented Aug 2, 2020

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Aug 2, 2020

@nodejs/fs

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Aug 2, 2020

@nodejs/collaborators This could use another review.

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Aug 3, 2020

Landed in a9c5b87

Trott added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2020
The buffer-as-path test for fs.symlinkSync() is a bit unusual and
potentially error-prone embedded in the general fs.symlink() test. Move
it to its own test file.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34540/files#r463168354

PR-URL: #34569
Reviewed-By: Pranshu Srivastava <rexagod@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
@Trott Trott closed this Aug 3, 2020
@Trott Trott deleted the symlink branch August 3, 2020 00:39
codebytere pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2020
The buffer-as-path test for fs.symlinkSync() is a bit unusual and
potentially error-prone embedded in the general fs.symlink() test. Move
it to its own test file.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34540/files#r463168354

PR-URL: #34569
Reviewed-By: Pranshu Srivastava <rexagod@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Aug 10, 2020
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2020
The buffer-as-path test for fs.symlinkSync() is a bit unusual and
potentially error-prone embedded in the general fs.symlink() test. Move
it to its own test file.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34540/files#r463168354

PR-URL: #34569
Reviewed-By: Pranshu Srivastava <rexagod@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
@danielleadams danielleadams mentioned this pull request Aug 20, 2020
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2021
The buffer-as-path test for fs.symlinkSync() is a bit unusual and
potentially error-prone embedded in the general fs.symlink() test. Move
it to its own test file.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34540/files#r463168354

PR-URL: #34569
Reviewed-By: Pranshu Srivastava <rexagod@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2021
The buffer-as-path test for fs.symlinkSync() is a bit unusual and
potentially error-prone embedded in the general fs.symlink() test. Move
it to its own test file.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34540/files#r463168354

PR-URL: #34569
Reviewed-By: Pranshu Srivastava <rexagod@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
@danielleadams danielleadams mentioned this pull request May 3, 2021
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 8, 2021
The buffer-as-path test for fs.symlinkSync() is a bit unusual and
potentially error-prone embedded in the general fs.symlink() test. Move
it to its own test file.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34540/files#r463168354

PR-URL: #34569
Reviewed-By: Pranshu Srivastava <rexagod@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants