Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

src: use correct microtask queue for checkpoints #36581

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

addaleax
Copy link
Member

@addaleax addaleax commented Dec 19, 2020

I missed in c6c8337 that we should not just use that queue for
enqueuing microtasks, but also for running them.

Refs: #36482

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

I missed in c6c8337 that we should not just use that queue for
enqueuing microtasks, but also for running them.

Refs: nodejs#36482
@addaleax addaleax added the embedding Issues and PRs related to embedding Node.js in another project. label Dec 19, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. label Dec 19, 2020
@addaleax addaleax added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Dec 19, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Dec 19, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@addaleax addaleax added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Dec 21, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@addaleax
Copy link
Member Author

Landed in 2070d5b

addaleax added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2020
I missed in c6c8337 that we should not just use that queue for
enqueuing microtasks, but also for running them.

Refs: #36482

PR-URL: #36581
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
@addaleax addaleax closed this Dec 21, 2020
@addaleax addaleax deleted the outer-microtask-queue-2 branch December 21, 2020 12:29
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2020
I missed in c6c8337 that we should not just use that queue for
enqueuing microtasks, but also for running them.

Refs: #36482

PR-URL: #36581
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
addaleax added a commit to addaleax/node that referenced this pull request May 23, 2021
I missed in c6c8337 that we should not just use that queue for
enqueuing microtasks, but also for running them.

Refs: nodejs#36482

PR-URL: nodejs#36581
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. embedding Issues and PRs related to embedding Node.js in another project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants