-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
deps: upgrade to npm 2.14.12 #4033
Conversation
Should this be rolled into #4003? |
This one can actually supersede #4003, except without all the discussion. Want me to copy the description snippets related to 2.14.11 into the description for this one? |
@zkat sure, when you get time. |
@Fishrock123 oh right, you don't get notified for edits... this PR's description has been updated. :) |
@zkat I probably won't merge this until I figure out the potential legal stuff that has been brought up because I really don't understand what is all up. :( |
Ok, the license here looks better... I think? Maybe this wasn't subject of the concerns in #3959 because it isn't npm 3. Running the tests again now. |
@zkat I can't seem to apply this onto |
appears to be conflicts in a bunch of files... biggest offender appears to be
but here is a complete list of all the bits that are in conflict |
fwiw
seems to have kinda worked, I did have to manually add some deleted files at the end I'm currently running @zkat is this commit made by just replacing the folder on 4.x and committing it? |
seeing two failures in the test suite
|
Hey @zkat as per the discussion on IRC would you be able to reopen this against Sorry for the confusion |
Hiii!
This PR includes two releases:
The main thing to note is a hopefully welcome update to our licensing to clarify scope of both the open source side and the registry TOS. There's a further clarification coming later this week, so we're not done with that bit yet -- so keep an eye out for v2.14.13.
This PR supersedes #4003, but have a look-see over there for some discussion. That PR should be closeable, though.
r: @jasnell
r: @Fishrock123
r: @chrisdickinson