-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
worker: improve code coverage #41818
Merged
aduh95
merged 4 commits into
nodejs:master
from
ErickWendel:worker/improve-code-coverage
Feb 11, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1b9e60b
worker: improve code coverage for assignEnvironmentData function
ErickWendel 0a3e3c7
worker: improve code coverage for getHeapSnapshot
ErickWendel 0bceab4
worker: add mustCall to the event to ensure the assert will be called…
ErickWendel 3027e15
worker: add test for heapsnapshot as an integration test
ErickWendel File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ | ||
'use strict'; | ||
|
||
const common = require('../common'); | ||
const assert = require('assert'); | ||
const { Worker } = require('worker_threads'); | ||
const { once } = require('events'); | ||
|
||
// Ensure that worker.getHeapSnapshot() returns a valid JSON | ||
(async () => { | ||
const worker = new Worker('setInterval(() => {}, 1000);', { eval: true }); | ||
await once(worker, 'online'); | ||
const stream = await worker.getHeapSnapshot(); | ||
assert.ok(JSON.parse(stream.read())); | ||
|
||
await worker.terminate(); | ||
})().then(common.mustCall()); |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hope this one isn't flaky like the other one
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@benjamingr @Trott which one was that? I was talking with @ErickWendel today and I might have some idea of what the problem was/is
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like it was already fixed #41204 ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, that test is actually very very similar to this one. That also means that I’m wrong about having an idea about the cause of the flakiness :)