-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: update guidance for adding new modules #44576
Changes from 6 commits
b4b1ced
9b3ae9a
e82833b
347453e
621a8b0
d129114
af6919e
a9fe2fe
0b19d4e
c524819
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -392,13 +392,21 @@ metadata. Raise a pull request like any other change. | |
|
||
Treat commits that introduce new core modules with extra care. | ||
|
||
Check if the module's name conflicts with an existing ecosystem module. If it | ||
does, choose a different name unless the module owner has agreed in writing to | ||
transfer it. | ||
New modules must be added with the `node:` prefix. | ||
mhdawson marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
If the new module name is free, register a placeholder in the module registry as | ||
soon as possible. Link to the pull request that introduces the new core module | ||
in the placeholder's `README`. | ||
When adding promises to an existing API, add `/promises` | ||
(`inspector/promises`, etc.). Apply the `semver-major` label to the addition. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. if node added a semver-major change that prevented any slashed requires/imports from core module names, then this category would no longer be semver-major after that. (edit: oops, this was mentioned here: #44576 (comment) ) There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I created #44651 for that. |
||
|
||
If the new module name without the `node:` prefix is free, register | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't think we need to call out
mhdawson marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
a placeholder in the module registry as soon as possible. Link to the pull | ||
request that introduces the new core module in the placeholder's `README`. | ||
|
||
If the module name without the `node:` prefix is not free and the module is | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Same comment here about not needing to mention
mhdawson marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
not widely used, contact the owner to see if they would be willing to transfer | ||
it to the project. | ||
|
||
targos marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
We try to register a placeholder without the `node:` prefix whenever | ||
Trott marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
possible to avoid confusion and typosquatting attacks. | ||
|
||
For pull requests introducing new core modules: | ||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This line is a little ambiguous. Are you saying based on the TSC vote that new modules should be available only with the
node:
prefix? If so, I think we should clarify that point (since core modules are already available with thenode:
prefix by default).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cjihrig thanks, incorporated this and your other comments.