Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test_runner: default to spec reporter when on TTY environment #46969

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

MoLow
Copy link
Member

@MoLow MoLow commented Mar 6, 2023

this will change the default reporter to be humanly readable when in an environment with TTY

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/test_runner

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added dont-land-on-v14.x needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test_runner Issues and PRs related to the test runner subsystem. labels Mar 6, 2023
@MoLow MoLow added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Mar 6, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Mar 6, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@MoLow MoLow added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Mar 6, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Mar 6, 2023
@MoLow MoLow added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Mar 7, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Mar 7, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@MoLow MoLow added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Mar 8, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Mar 8, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@MoLow MoLow force-pushed the default-to-spec-reporter branch 2 times, most recently from 36249a4 to 41de945 Compare March 8, 2023 01:27
@MoLow MoLow added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Mar 8, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Mar 8, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@MoLow MoLow added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. labels Mar 8, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added commit-queue-failed An error occurred while landing this pull request using GitHub Actions. and removed commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. labels Mar 8, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Commit Queue failed
- Loading data for nodejs/node/pull/46969
✔  Done loading data for nodejs/node/pull/46969
----------------------------------- PR info ------------------------------------
Title      test_runner: default to spec reporter when on TTY environment (#46969)
Author     Moshe Atlow  (@MoLow)
Branch     MoLow:default-to-spec-reporter -> nodejs:main
Labels     author ready, needs-ci, dont-land-on-v14.x, test_runner
Commits    1
 - test_runner: default to spec reporter when on TTY environment
Committers 1
 - Moshe Atlow 
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/46969
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum 
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig 
------------------------------ Generated metadata ------------------------------
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/46969
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum 
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ⚠  Commits were pushed since the last review:
   ⚠  - test_runner: default to spec reporter when on TTY environment
   ℹ  This PR was created on Mon, 06 Mar 2023 10:31:29 GMT
   ✔  Approvals: 2
   ✔  - Benjamin Gruenbaum (@benjamingr): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/46969#pullrequestreview-1326024666
   ✔  - Colin Ihrig (@cjihrig) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/46969#pullrequestreview-1326665588
   ✔  Last GitHub CI successful
   ℹ  Last Full PR CI on 2023-03-08T06:07:00Z: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/50271/
- Querying data for job/node-test-pull-request/50271/
   ✔  Last Jenkins CI successful
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ✔  Aborted `git node land` session in /home/runner/work/node/node/.ncu
https://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/4363465881

MoLow added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2023
PR-URL: #46969
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
@MoLow
Copy link
Member Author

MoLow commented Mar 8, 2023

Landed in 9960c36

@MoLow MoLow closed this Mar 8, 2023
@MoLow MoLow deleted the default-to-spec-reporter branch March 8, 2023 22:23
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2023
PR-URL: #46969
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2023
PR-URL: #46969
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
PR-URL: #46969
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. commit-queue-failed An error occurred while landing this pull request using GitHub Actions. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test_runner Issues and PRs related to the test runner subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants