Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
loader: use default loader as cascaded loader in the in loader worker #47620
loader: use default loader as cascaded loader in the in loader worker #47620
Changes from 6 commits
3707d00
4c0fbfd
bb939a5
954e02e
b691d14
36f9c62
3db9ee1
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit:
id
seems misleading to me, like it's a PID or similar, rather than a path.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's definitely not a path (because the internal module loader doesn't use paths), I think calling it an ID is more correct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
O.o it is literally the path to the file (but with CJS's whacked exclusion of the file extension) and is even consumed as such:
node/lib/internal/modules/esm/hooks.js
Line 498 in 3707d00
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not the path to a file, because internal modules are not in the FS, it's more correct to think of them as an offset in the
node
binary.InternalWorker
constructor doesn't take a path, it only accepts internal module IDs – you can try to replaceloaderWorkerId
with a path at the line you linked to to convince yourself if you want.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it’s whatever we call the string that’s the input to
internalBinding()
. The signature of that function isinternalBinding(module)
, so I guess we could useloaderWorkerModule
. Not sure if that’s any better thanloaderWorkerId
. It’s not really a specifier because we don’t use this withimport
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
loaderWorkerModuleId
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: just make this a getter?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would assume a function call would be slower than just mapping directly to a primitive?