-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
build: add action to close stale PRs #48051
Conversation
Add action to close PRs that are over 1 year old and have had no comments or updates in the last 6 months. Fixes: nodejs#42981 Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com>
Review requested:
|
We currently have over 195 pull requests which were created more than a year ago and (up from 117 a year ago). Most of those have not had an update/comments for over 6 months. This PR adds an action which will mark pull requests older than 1 year as stale once there have been no comments/updates for 5 months and then close them after another month if that does not trigger any comments. I think this will help us lower the backlog of PRs (430 right) now) and in particular by helping close those which are very unlikely to land. A simple comment is all it takes to reset the PR so that it won't be closed if that is the right thing to do. I had to add a new option to actions/stale to support the 1 year old check (end date - actions/stale#1013) so this uses my version of that action until we get the updated landed in actions/stale. The current action also requires PRs to be tagged with the Once all PRs that are currently stale are processed I'll then remove the requirement for that lable in a follow on PR and we will be at steady state where PRs get processed as they reach the 1year old and 6 months without any updates point. |
Co-authored-by: mscdex <mscdex@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mscdex <mscdex@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mscdex <mscdex@users.noreply.github.com>
Can this be a modification of |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
@Trott testing actions is a bit difficult and I'd be a bit worried that by combining in I might break the existing action or cause issues we don't want to be processed covered. If we want to consolidate then maybe we can do that as a follow on step as we already have more than one action handling stale issues. |
Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com>
@nodejs/tsc FYI that I plan to land this in the next day or so unless there are comments/objections. |
Landed in 65be890 |
My original plan of adding a lable to limit those initially process as outlined in nodejs#48051 does not work I think because adding a lable updates the last update time. - Removing the need for the lable - Remove the cron scheduling so that it only runs when I run it manually - Fix the display name for the action as I missed updating that after cut and paste from existing action The plan will be to find stop dates that should only affect a reasonable number of PRs at a time and then run in batches using that instead. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com>
My original plan of adding a lable to limit those initially process as outlined in #48051 does not work I think because adding a lable updates the last update time. - Removing the need for the lable - Remove the cron scheduling so that it only runs when I run it manually - Fix the display name for the action as I missed updating that after cut and paste from existing action The plan will be to find stop dates that should only affect a reasonable number of PRs at a time and then run in batches using that instead. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com> PR-URL: #48196 Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com>
My original plan of adding a lable to limit those initially process as outlined in #48051 does not work I think because adding a lable updates the last update time. - Removing the need for the lable - Remove the cron scheduling so that it only runs when I run it manually - Fix the display name for the action as I missed updating that after cut and paste from existing action The plan will be to find stop dates that should only affect a reasonable number of PRs at a time and then run in batches using that instead. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com> PR-URL: #48196 Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com>
Add action to close PRs that are over 1 year old and have had no comments or updates in the last 6 months. Fixes: nodejs#42981 Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com> PR-URL: nodejs#48051 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Add action to close PRs that are over 1 year old and have had no comments or updates in the last 6 months. Fixes: nodejs#42981 Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com> PR-URL: nodejs#48051 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
My original plan of adding a lable to limit those initially process as outlined in nodejs#48051 does not work I think because adding a lable updates the last update time. - Removing the need for the lable - Remove the cron scheduling so that it only runs when I run it manually - Fix the display name for the action as I missed updating that after cut and paste from existing action The plan will be to find stop dates that should only affect a reasonable number of PRs at a time and then run in batches using that instead. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com> PR-URL: nodejs#48196 Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com>
Add action to close PRs that are over 1 year old and have had no comments or updates in the last 6 months. Fixes: nodejs#42981 Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com> PR-URL: nodejs#48051 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
My original plan of adding a lable to limit those initially process as outlined in nodejs#48051 does not work I think because adding a lable updates the last update time. - Removing the need for the lable - Remove the cron scheduling so that it only runs when I run it manually - Fix the display name for the action as I missed updating that after cut and paste from existing action The plan will be to find stop dates that should only affect a reasonable number of PRs at a time and then run in batches using that instead. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com> PR-URL: nodejs#48196 Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com>
My original plan of adding a lable to limit those initially process as outlined in #48051 does not work I think because adding a lable updates the last update time. - Removing the need for the lable - Remove the cron scheduling so that it only runs when I run it manually - Fix the display name for the action as I missed updating that after cut and paste from existing action The plan will be to find stop dates that should only affect a reasonable number of PRs at a time and then run in batches using that instead. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com> PR-URL: #48196 Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com>
Add action to close PRs that are over 1 year old and have had no comments or updates in the last 6 months.
Fixes: #42981