-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
src,permission: add --allow-addon flag #51183
Merged
nodejs-github-bot
merged 1 commit into
nodejs:main
from
RafaelGSS:permission-allow-addon
Dec 21, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ | ||
// Flags: --experimental-permission --allow-addons --allow-fs-read=* | ||
'use strict'; | ||
|
||
const common = require('../common'); | ||
common.skipIfWorker(); | ||
|
||
const { createRequire } = require('node:module'); | ||
const assert = require('node:assert'); | ||
const fixtures = require('../common/fixtures'); | ||
const loadFixture = createRequire(fixtures.path('node_modules')); | ||
// When a permission is set by cli, the process shouldn't be able | ||
// to require native addons unless --allow-addons is sent | ||
{ | ||
// doesNotThrow | ||
const msg = loadFixture('pkgexports/no-addons'); | ||
assert.strictEqual(msg, 'using native addons'); | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ | ||
// Flags: --experimental-permission --allow-fs-read=* | ||
'use strict'; | ||
|
||
const common = require('../common'); | ||
common.skipIfWorker(); | ||
|
||
const { createRequire } = require('node:module'); | ||
const assert = require('node:assert'); | ||
const fixtures = require('../common/fixtures'); | ||
const loadFixture = createRequire(fixtures.path('node_modules')); | ||
// When a permission is set by cli, the process shouldn't be able | ||
// to require native addons unless --allow-addons is sent | ||
{ | ||
// doesNotThrow | ||
const msg = loadFixture('pkgexports/no-addons'); | ||
assert.strictEqual(msg, 'not using native addons'); | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of overloading the value used for
--addons
, can we just addallow_addons
into the considerations inEnvironment::no_native_addons()
? Also it would be clearer ifallow_addons
is renamed to something likeallow_addons_in_permissions
to differentiate this with--addons
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm following a pattern we use on the permission model:
--allow-child-process
--allow-worker
--allow-fs-read
--allow-fs-write
I feel naming it as
--allow-addons-in-permissions
would be odd. The reason I'm not touching theEnvironment::no_native_addons()
logic is that it would be less clear from a permission model perspective if we handle permissions in a separate point of nodejs initialization/getter. That's pretty much what I told Tobias.