Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: reduce flakiness of test-runner-output #51952

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 5, 2024

Conversation

aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

@aduh95 aduh95 commented Mar 3, 2024

It was failing 1% of the times on my local machine. With that patch, I got no failures on 1000 runs.

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels Mar 3, 2024
@aduh95 aduh95 added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Mar 3, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Mar 3, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@aduh95 aduh95 added commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. commit-queue-squash Add this label to instruct the Commit Queue to squash all the PR commits into the first one. labels Mar 4, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Mar 5, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit 16579d7 into nodejs:main Mar 5, 2024
54 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in 16579d7

@aduh95 aduh95 deleted the test-runner-output branch March 5, 2024 21:38
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2024
PR-URL: #51952
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2024
cjihrig added a commit to cjihrig/node that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2024
This commit is similar to nodejs#51952. When the system is under load
it is possible for these timeout tests to become flaky. We
work around that by using a much longer setTimeout() in the test
so that it is not racing against the test's timeout. But, we have
to unref() such a large timeout. And, because test timeouts do
not currently keep the event loop alive, we use a different
setTimeout() for that purpose.

Fixes: nodejs#52139
Refs: nodejs#52140
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2024
This commit is similar to #51952. When the system is under load
it is possible for these timeout tests to become flaky. We
work around that by using a much longer setTimeout() in the test
so that it is not racing against the test's timeout. But, we have
to unref() such a large timeout. And, because test timeouts do
not currently keep the event loop alive, we use a different
setTimeout() for that purpose.

Fixes: #52139
Refs: #52140
PR-URL: #52146
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
richardlau pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
PR-URL: #51952
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
richardlau pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
PR-URL: #51952
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
@richardlau richardlau mentioned this pull request Mar 25, 2024
rdw-msft pushed a commit to rdw-msft/node that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2024
PR-URL: nodejs#51952
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
rdw-msft pushed a commit to rdw-msft/node that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2024
This commit is similar to nodejs#51952. When the system is under load
it is possible for these timeout tests to become flaky. We
work around that by using a much longer setTimeout() in the test
so that it is not racing against the test's timeout. But, we have
to unref() such a large timeout. And, because test timeouts do
not currently keep the event loop alive, we use a different
setTimeout() for that purpose.

Fixes: nodejs#52139
Refs: nodejs#52140
PR-URL: nodejs#52146
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
marco-ippolito pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
This commit is similar to #51952. When the system is under load
it is possible for these timeout tests to become flaky. We
work around that by using a much longer setTimeout() in the test
so that it is not racing against the test's timeout. But, we have
to unref() such a large timeout. And, because test timeouts do
not currently keep the event loop alive, we use a different
setTimeout() for that purpose.

Fixes: #52139
Refs: #52140
PR-URL: #52146
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
marco-ippolito pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
This commit is similar to #51952. When the system is under load
it is possible for these timeout tests to become flaky. We
work around that by using a much longer setTimeout() in the test
so that it is not racing against the test's timeout. But, we have
to unref() such a large timeout. And, because test timeouts do
not currently keep the event loop alive, we use a different
setTimeout() for that purpose.

Fixes: #52139
Refs: #52140
PR-URL: #52146
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. commit-queue-squash Add this label to instruct the Commit Queue to squash all the PR commits into the first one. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants