Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ambassador program #52857

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Ambassador program #52857

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mhdawson
Copy link
Member

@mhdawson mhdawson commented May 6, 2024

No description provided.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/tsc

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label May 6, 2024
@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

mhdawson commented May 6, 2024

Some related background

@benjamingr
Copy link
Member

@goldbergyoni @lirantal

doc/contributing/advocacy-ambasador-program.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/contributing/advocacy-ambasador-program.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/contributing/advocacy-ambasador-program.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/contributing/advocacy-ambasador-program.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/contributing/advocacy-ambasador-program.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/contributing/advocacy-ambasador-program.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/contributing/advocacy-ambasador-program.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/contributing/advocacy-ambasador-program.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/contributing/advocacy-ambasador-program.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/contributing/advocacy-ambasador-program.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mhdawson mhdawson added the tsc-agenda Issues and PRs to discuss during the meetings of the TSC. label May 7, 2024
@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

mhdawson commented May 7, 2024

@kyliewd FYI as the current approach asks for retweets through slack.

@kyliewd
Copy link

kyliewd commented May 7, 2024

thanks @mhdawson - this sounds fine to me. i would add though that as ambassadors for the project, they need to follow CoC guidelines (especially when promoting content)

i'm happy to help promote this as needed

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

@kyliewd thanks for reviewing/confirming.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

@kyliewd and good point about the CoC, will add some words around that.

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented May 21, 2024

I won't block over this but: We seem to spin these things up from time to time (Evangelism, Social Media Delegates, Outreach, Node.js Collection, and more) and it seems that they never work out well. I don't see an indication of what is different this time around that makes a more successful initiative likely. Maybe a clear sentence explaining the goal (or mission or vision or whatever) in the document would help mitigate the "Haven't we seen this before?" sense I'm getting. Is this based on a successful initiative in another big project (like Python or Rust) or something like that?

Trott
Trott previously requested changes May 21, 2024
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TBD needs to be replaced, right?

doc/contributing/advocacy-ambasador-program.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

@Trott since you've indicated you won't block, I assume no response to the comment of "this never works out well". Buy my 2 cents I think this is a much more specific/constrained proposal than some of the instances you pointed to which started as WIP and never went beyond that.

@Trott Trott dismissed their stale review May 22, 2024 17:52

TBD replaced

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

@Trott, I can't find it right now but on the question of calendar year versus 12 months I think calendar year makes more sense. It will be easier to handle all together versus trying to track 12 months for each ambassador.

@Trott

This comment was marked as resolved.

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented May 30, 2024

Michael let me know that there was a 2-hour discussion about this in February. I can't find any comprehensive notes (just a few bullet points, but also maybe I don't know where to look?--the siloing problem is real!), but there's a video at https://www.youtube.com/live/gTgHkyCyXP0.

So, you know, if anyone else wants a fuller background on where this is coming from, that might help.

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented May 30, 2024

Michael let me know that there was a 2-hour discussion about this in February. I can't find any comprehensive notes (just a few bullet points, but also maybe I don't know where to look?--the siloing problem is real!), but there's a video at https://www.youtube.com/live/gTgHkyCyXP0.

So, you know, if anyone else wants a fuller background on where this is coming from, that might help.

One surprise for me is that it seems that the goal here is to solve friction/pain points experienced by self-identified advocates for Node.js. That's a separate (but, obviously, related) population from Node.js core and Node.js users. It's a different lens than the one I was looking through.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

mhdawson commented Jun 6, 2024

@Trott thanks for adding the link to the video, thats probably something I should have included when I opended the PR as providing good context.

Copy link
Member

@avivkeller avivkeller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

I'm not a core collaborator, and these are only suggestions

Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
@mhdawson mhdawson force-pushed the ambassador-program branch from 0afa954 to ff37eb0 Compare June 12, 2024 22:11
@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

Squashed, rebased and forced pushed to see if that will fix the Windows failure as I think that job has been temporarily disabled.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

Plan to land tomorrow assuming CI passes.

mhdawson added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
PR-URL: #52857
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

Landed in 756b397

@mhdawson mhdawson closed this Jun 13, 2024
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2024
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
PR-URL: #52857
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
sophoniie pushed a commit to sophoniie/node that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2024
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#52857
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
bmeck pushed a commit to bmeck/node that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2024
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#52857
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
marco-ippolito pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2024
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
PR-URL: #52857
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
marco-ippolito pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2024
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
PR-URL: #52857
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. tsc-agenda Issues and PRs to discuss during the meetings of the TSC.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.