Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: update weak module for gc tests #7014

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented May 27, 2016

Checklist
  • tests and code linting passes
  • the commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test

Description of change

Previous version of weak used for gc tests emitted a warning on OS X.
Updating to current version eliminates warning.

R=@bnoordhuis?

Previous version of weak used for gc tests emitted a warning on OS X.
Updating to current version eliminates warning.
@Trott Trott added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label May 27, 2016
@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

I'm not about to review a +9,391 −279 diff so rubber-stamp LGTM.

Meta: The gc tests are not run regularly. How about we either add them to the CI or we scrap them? I personally don't find them that valuable but I'm interested in what others think.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented May 27, 2016

Oy, yeah, that diff is harsh lol. rubber-stamp LGTM here also if CI is possible. Also agree with @bnoordhuis in that if we're not running these regularly, they're not of very much use to keep around.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe we should run these in citgm? cc @thealphanerd ?

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented May 27, 2016

@Fishrock123 The changes are in test/gc/node_modules. I may be mistaken, but I don't think CITGM would be affected by that or exercise that code at all. In fact, I'm pretty sure nothing is affected except people (like me) who sometimes run make test-gc at the command line.

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented May 27, 2016

@Fishrock123 Oh, wait, maybe you're just suggesting that weak be added to the list of modules that CITGM tests? If so: Yes, +1 to that.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

@Trott I'm suggesting that maybe we should put it in a separate repo and include it in the citgm tests.

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented May 31, 2016

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/2883/

EDIT: One Pi buildbot explosion and one Pi inexplicably hung during a git operation. Otherwise, all green in CI.

Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request May 31, 2016
Previous version of weak used for gc tests emitted a warning on OS X.
Updating to current version eliminates warning.

PR-URL: nodejs#7014
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented May 31, 2016

Landed in 0d7f313

@Trott Trott closed this May 31, 2016
Fishrock123 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2016
Previous version of weak used for gc tests emitted a warning on OS X.
Updating to current version eliminates warning.

PR-URL: #7014
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2016
Previous version of weak used for gc tests emitted a warning on OS X.
Updating to current version eliminates warning.

PR-URL: #7014
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2016
Previous version of weak used for gc tests emitted a warning on OS X.
Updating to current version eliminates warning.

PR-URL: #7014
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2016
Previous version of weak used for gc tests emitted a warning on OS X.
Updating to current version eliminates warning.

PR-URL: #7014
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2016
Previous version of weak used for gc tests emitted a warning on OS X.
Updating to current version eliminates warning.

PR-URL: #7014
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2016
Previous version of weak used for gc tests emitted a warning on OS X.
Updating to current version eliminates warning.

PR-URL: #7014
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2016
Previous version of weak used for gc tests emitted a warning on OS X.
Updating to current version eliminates warning.

PR-URL: #7014
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jul 12, 2016
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2016
Previous version of weak used for gc tests emitted a warning on OS X.
Updating to current version eliminates warning.

PR-URL: #7014
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2016
Previous version of weak used for gc tests emitted a warning on OS X.
Updating to current version eliminates warning.

PR-URL: #7014
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@Trott Trott deleted the weak branch January 13, 2022 22:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants