events: implement EventEmitter#getMaxListeners() #82
Conversation
| Returns the current max listener value for the emitter which is either set by | ||
| `emitter.setMaxListeners(n)` or defaults to `EventEmitter.defaultMaxListeners`. | ||
|
|
||
| This can be usefull to increment/decrement max listeners to avoid the warning |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
s/usefull/useful
Maybe clarify what warning? I know the warning but might be better to specify.
tellnes
force-pushed
the
getMaxListeners
branch
from
def554f
to
dfe3ecf
Compare
|
@kenany Thanks for feedback. I've addressed your issues. About clarifying the warning. Yes, I think that should be done, but I think it is out of scope for this pull request. |
| @@ -67,6 +67,14 @@ EventEmitter.prototype.setMaxListeners = function setMaxListeners(n) { | |||
| return this; | |||
| }; | |||
|
|
|||
| EventEmitter.prototype.getMaxListeners = function getMaxListeners() { | |||
| if (!util.isUndefined(this._maxListeners)) { | |||
| return this._maxListeners; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
how about returning Infinity when this._maxListeners is 0 to make more semantic, actually setMaxListeners(Infinity) is working well, too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, I was thinking about that. It will return Infinity if you have done setMaxListeners(Infinity). But it is documented that 0 means unlimited and I think being concise with existing api is best.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
haha, yup, but the Infinity in fact is better, because both setMaxListeners(Infinity) and setMaxListeners(0) are working always. perhaps any thoughts from TC?
|
Some style issues but otherwise LGTM. I'd like one more person to sign off on this. |
tellnes
force-pushed
the
getMaxListeners
branch
from
dfe3ecf
to
9de06aa
Compare
|
I've fixed all comments so far. The only thing missing is if it should return |
|
I would just make it return zero. Intuitively, I would expect I'll land this PR assuming tests pass. If someone feels strongly about the return value, they can follow up with a PR of their own. |
|
LGTM. |
|
Landed in 0115a5e. Thanks, Christian! |
Fixes nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#8237. PR-URL: #82 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
|
Sorry about that, I screwed up the commit. 2931348 it is. |
brendanashworth
added
semver-minor
…recompiled_vfsVfsNet While working with NodeJS tests it was found that some of them (tests) requires access to /etc/hosts file and so the getaddrinfo() call falls to error. The quote from developers: > The issue was nailed down to the ramdisk access for the entity which > implements network access (precompiled_vfsVfsNet). As appropriated > partition hasn't been mounted for it (so it is not exists for it). The > access to the ramdisk is covered by another entity, called > precompiled_vfsVfsRamFs. So it is required to configure (allow) access > for the precompiled_vfsVfsNet to the ramdisk over explicit properties. > > Besides of that it is required to add the 'hosts' file to the romfs > image, to make it accessible by application over /etc mount from romfs. TFS: nodejs#82 Signed-off-by: Vadim Lomovtsev <vadim.lomovtsev@auriga.com>
ghost
mentioned this pull request
fixes nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#8237