-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 143
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue/309 docs table of contents #333
Issue/309 docs table of contents #333
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Made follow up issues for the following topics in the list, either because they are new, or because it would be good to move them out of draft status:
- Repository Settings (new) - [docs] repository settings (new) #339
- Continuous Integration / Delivery (draft) - [docs] continuous integration / continuous delivery (draft) #340
- Workflows (draft) - [docs] workflows (new) #341
- Code of Conduct (draft) - [docs] code of conduct (new) #342
- Security (draft) - [docs] security guidelines (draft) #343
- Testing (draft) - [docs] testing guidelines (draft) #344
- Publishing Guidelines (draft) - [docs] publishing guidelines (draft) #345
- Support (draft) - [docs] package support (draft) #346
- Tools (draft) - [docs] tools (draft) #347
Depending on order of merges, we should probably include Dependency Management on this list as there is a PR open for adding it to the project.
Also missed out on tools.md, so added that to the ToC.
One question: is there criteria documented for what is considered a document in draft status vs not in draft status? In other words, how does a draft actually move out of that status, if it is in it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Merging more than 7 days from 4th approve and no blocking review
I think we could could think to drafts as
Right now there is not a shared structure (like file name in UPPERCASE and some in lower), it would be good have it since we are writing a lot of docs 👍 |
Description
Coming out of the 2020-03-10 meeting of the Package Maintenance team, on the topic of issue #309, the suggestion was that this comment on the suggestion of a Table of Contents for the docs in the repository be extracted out into its own PR.
Summary of Changes
Questions / Considerations
Just around docs in general...