Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: migrate existing docs to gatsby #274

Closed
wants to merge 20 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

claudiahdz
Copy link
Contributor

@claudiahdz claudiahdz commented Oct 31, 2019

This PR migrates our old CLI docs website to a new Gatsby generated one.

Changes:

  • Deleted both html and doc folders
  • Modified Makefile with new docs build process
  • Refactored to node doc-build.sh
  • Added new Gatsby website
  • Modified lib/help.js to handle the new path where docs live
  • Updated tests with proper docs path

@claudiahdz claudiahdz requested a review from a team as a code owner October 31, 2019 16:59
oletizi and others added 2 commits October 31, 2019 19:36
- Added an install page (copied from existing online docs)
- Added a FeatureLink component to components/links.js

note: external link on features page has a hack for styling; that should probably be fixed, but want to get the copy to the team asap.
richardlau added a commit to richardlau/cli that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2019
A few references to the `doc` target were not updated to `docs` in
npm#274 and resulted in `make release`
not building the docs.
mikemimik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2019
A few references to the `doc` target were not updated to `docs` in
#274 and resulted in `make release`
not building the docs.

PR-URL: #546
Credit: @richardlau
Close: #546
Reviewed-by: @mikemimik
@claudiahdz claudiahdz deleted the docs/new-gatsby-site branch December 11, 2019 15:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants