Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release build workflow #797

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 26, 2024
Merged

Release build workflow #797

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
6971c00
Release build workflow
dtchepak Apr 20, 2024
67c0d29
Release build - apply review comments
dtchepak Apr 29, 2024
b13091c
Change artifact retention on release build
dtchepak Apr 30, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
44 changes: 44 additions & 0 deletions .github/workflows/release_build.yml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
name: Release build
dtchepak marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
on:
workflow_dispatch:
push:
dtchepak marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
tags:
- 'v*'

env:
dtchepak marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
CONFIGURATION: Release

jobs:
build:
runs-on: windows-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0

- name: Setup .NET
uses: actions/setup-dotnet@v4
with:
dotnet-version: |
6.0.x
7.0.x
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can remove .NET 7 sdk from this list

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

.NET 7 is still used here.

NSubstitute/tests/NSubstitute.Acceptance.Specs/NSubstitute.Acceptance.Specs.csproj

Line 4 in 19b38fd

<TargetFrameworks>net8.0;net7.0;net6.0;net462</TargetFrameworks>

Removing this is a breaking change I guess

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no, we don't need to run test for packing. we use for tests another pipeline

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good one :)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Current targets have test as dependency so will still run. Can do this if we switch to dotnet pack

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Current targets have test as dependency so will still run. Can do this if we switch to dotnet pack

Maybe that's indeed better, but IMO is not that important. I don't mind the .NET 7 here

8.0.x

- name: Setup Ruby for documentation build
uses: ruby/setup-ruby@v1
with:
ruby-version: '3.2'
bundler-cache: true

- name: Build package and docs
run: dotnet run --project 'build/build.fsproj' -- -t All
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I propose to use dotnet pack for packaging instead of custom tool and use tool only for documentation

- name: Pack
  run: dotnet pack -c Release -p:Version=${{ inputs.Version }} -o "bin/Release/NSubstitute" NSubstitute\NSubstitute.csproj

- name: Validate and build documentation
  run: dotnet run build/build.fsproj -- -t Documentation

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also as I see we have following fragment in csproj

  <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(CI)' == 'True'">
    <!--Deterministic Build and Source Link settings -->
    <ContinuousIntegrationBuild>true</ContinuousIntegrationBuild>
    <EmbedUntrackedSources>true</EmbedUntrackedSources>
    <IncludeSymbols>true</IncludeSymbols>
    <SymbolPackageFormat>snupkg</SymbolPackageFormat>
  </PropertyGroup>

maybe also make sense to add /p:CI=True or remove this condition from PropertyGroup (probably better to remove)
but I'm not an expert in snupkg and don't know how it works

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can't do ContinuousIntegrationBuild locally and those settings are needed for deterministic packages/source link. Therefore the check on CI

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't disagree with this, but do you have an outline of the pros and cons of switching?

The current FAKE-based build sorts out our versioning so I don't think it's as straightforward as switching directly (given constraint that I'd like to make version based on repo contents rather than an input).

Maybe can defer until larger build changes are done? (as per #797 (comment))

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, 100% it could be changed later.

My private opinion:
dotent cli is a default way to interact with .NET projects like build\restore\pack\publish. From my point of view, make sense to use default approach for default problems. Just no need to reinvent the wheel. Fake and fsharp is just additional complexity.


- name: Upload artifacts
dtchepak marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
dtchepak marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
with:
path: |
bin/Release/NSubstitute/*.nupkg
bin/Release/NSubstitute/*.snupkg
bin/Release/nsubstitute.github.com/

Loading