Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove old examples Part 1 #3551

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 24, 2017
Merged

Remove old examples Part 1 #3551

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 24, 2017

Conversation

rhyolight
Copy link
Member

@rhyolight rhyolight commented Apr 14, 2017

WIP

contributes to #3543

Removes:

  • examples/opf/experiments/anomaly/spatial/10field_many_balanced
  • examples/opf/experiments/anomaly/temporal/noisy_saw
  • examples/opf/experiments/anomaly/temporal/saw_200_category
  • examples/opf/experiments/classification/category_SP_0
  • examples/opf/experiments/classification/category_SP_1

examples/opf/experiments/anomaly/temporal/noisy_saw/UNDER_DEVELOPMENT
examples/opf/experiments/anomaly/temporal/noisy_saw/description.py
examples/opf/experiments/anomaly/temporal/saw_200_category/UNDER_DEVELOPMENT
examples/opf/experiments/anomaly/temporal/saw_200_category/data.csv
examples/opf/experiments/anomaly/temporal/saw_200_category/description.py
examples/opf/experiments/classification/category_SP_0/UNDER_DEVELOPMENT
examples/opf/experiments/classification/category_SP_0/description.py
examples/opf/experiments/classification/category_SP_1/UNDER_DEVELOPMENT
examples/opf/experiments/classification/category_SP_1/description.py
@rhyolight
Copy link
Member Author

@subutai or @scottpurdy please approve. I'm doing these a bit at a time.

@rhyolight rhyolight requested review from scottpurdy and subutai April 14, 2017 21:44
@scottpurdy
Copy link
Contributor

I don't really know what things we may want to keep around. For instance, we may want more than hotgym for our regular testing. It looks like some of this stuff is simple artificial data. We can either dump that or keep it if we want to have a suite of algorithm-unit-tests so we can easily validate that new algorithm changes handle all the basic cases. But that sounds like some work and we can always come bring it back later.

Will defer to @subutai on the general question of whether we want to keep these misc. examples around.

@rhyolight
Copy link
Member Author

@scottpurdy Keep in mind these were all marked as UNDER_DEVELOPMENT and were not running as a part of our test suite.

@rhyolight rhyolight merged commit 41004a3 into numenta:master Apr 24, 2017
@rhyolight rhyolight deleted the nuke-old-1 branch April 24, 2017 18:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants