remove old deprecation warning for ruff

[phanirithvij]

Describe the bug

I keep seeing the warning programs.ruff.enable has been renamed to programs.ruff.check

But the thing is I am not even using ruff in my treefmt config.

To Reproduce

Not sure, whenever I am doing nixos-rebuild or home-manager switch I get it sometimes, but not when using treefmt-nix via nix fmt

Expected behavior

If I am not using it, it shouldn't warn me.

System information

$ nix-shell -p nix-info --run "nix-info -m"
 - system: `"x86_64-linux"`
 - host os: `Linux 6.6.44, NixOS, 24.11 (Vicuna), 24.11.20240806.8e27e75`
 - multi-user?: `yes`
 - sandbox: `yes`
 - version: `nix-env (Nix) 2.18.5`
 - channels(root): `"nixos"`
 - nixpkgs: `/nix/store/whdnxrs6vh9wv72fvkp4622wsl36x6xx-source`

Additional context

Maybe just disable that in ruff.nix as a temporary fix. since it has been a while since the users were warned about it.

[zimbatm]

I'm not able to reproduce locally. Can you share the code?

[phanirithvij]

So I made a repo https://github.com/phanirithvij/nix-eval-bugreport, just do nix develop inside it and you should see the trace.

Also to reproduce it I had to find ~/.cache/nix/eval-cache-v5/ -type f -cmin -2 # -delete # uncomment delete which deletes the recent eval which should be nix develop (quick and dirty)
and do nix develop again.

[phanirithvij]

So my guess is it is working as it is supposed to?
Just like how I get all the current traces defined in nixpkgs printed when doing nixos-rebuild for the very first evaluation?

So this is a non-issue but since I keep modifying my flake regularly I keep seeing this frequently.
Sorry, I guess this github issue can be closed and you may decide on whether or not to proceed with #212.

[zimbatm]

Thanks. This is surprising to me, too, so I will use your repo to investigate. I would expect the warning to only show up when the enable option is being used.

I also noticed that nix flake check currently has an eval error because of ruff not having an enable function, and not sure why CI didn't catch that.

[phanirithvij]

My guess is it is same as NixOS/nixpkgs#306276

Edit: nvm I don't know what I'm talking about.

[zimbatm]

👍 thanks, found the solution thanks to your repro