-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature Request]: is there an option can be used to exclude iojs? #3386
Comments
This is a bit of a duplicate of #1080. tldr, no, there isn't currently an option for that. however, it's very reasonable to allow it to be set to an empty string, and thus bypass the check. |
it meens empty string is not allowed for now, right? i tried empty string, it seems like empty string not work |
Correct, it's not allowed for now. I'll add it soon tho. |
@ljharb Looking forward to this. I tried Additionally, a valid mirror hub with invalid |
If you set the iojs mirror env var to an empty string, it should skip that lookup. |
I fetched tag |
ah, you're right, that commit isn't merged yet - i still have tests to write. |
In my environment,
nvm ls-remote
andnvm install
sometimes takes long time to connect. I am not sure why this happen (may be network).I changed
NVM_NODEJS_ORG_MIRROR
withhttps://npmmirror.com/mirrors/node/
and it works fine with--lts
option (I am not sure if this option applied to filter node?).The confused thing is that I cannot found an available iojs mirror to speed up
NVM_IOJS_ORG_MIRROR
.Is there is an option to exclude iojs? If not, will this be added?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: