Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "engine: Disable usage of keycloak (#120)" #124

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

arso
Copy link
Contributor

@arso arso commented Apr 22, 2022

This reverts commit eee6584.

@arso arso marked this pull request as draft April 22, 2022 07:46
@arso arso self-assigned this Apr 22, 2022
Copy link
Member

@mwperina mwperina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, just not sure if this Friday is a good day to reenable it aagain

@arso
Copy link
Contributor Author

arso commented Apr 22, 2022

Looks good, just not sure if this Friday is a good day to reenable it aagain

Absolutely not! It's a draft and it should stay like that until I have at least one green OST build. I would rather not merge it before Monday.

@arso arso marked this pull request as ready for review May 5, 2022 08:26
@michalskrivanek
Copy link
Member

fwiw #133 is imho the right one to merge

@arso
Copy link
Contributor Author

arso commented May 5, 2022

Nah - only he related part should be copied. That other patch is not intended to be merged because it hardcodes keycloak and installs keycloak packages which should be required as part of oVirt/ovirt-engine#295.

I would like to have basic suite passing first and then focus on HE part.

@arso arso mentioned this pull request May 5, 2022
@arso arso marked this pull request as draft May 5, 2022 12:52
@arso
Copy link
Contributor Author

arso commented May 5, 2022

Deprecated by #141

@arso
Copy link
Contributor Author

arso commented May 9, 2022

Deprecated - closing

@arso arso closed this May 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants