Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[new release] tls-mirage and tls (0.13.1) #18554

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 22, 2021

Conversation

hannesm
Copy link
Member

@hannesm hannesm commented Apr 22, 2021

Transport Layer Security purely in OCaml, MirageOS layer

CHANGES:

CHANGES:

* Breaking: use deriving sexp_of instead of sexp. Constructing a state from
  a sexp has not been supported (lead to exception), and is now removed
  (mirleft/ocaml-tls#430 by @torinnd, continued in mirleft/ocaml-tls#431 by @hannesm)
* Bugfix: TLS 1.3 client authentication with certificate, client side. This
  used to work accidentally before 0.13.0 changed the signature algorithms
  handling, now the right signature algorithm (as requested by server) is used.
  (mirleft/ocaml-tls#431 @hannesm, @talex5 reported mirage/capnp-rpc#228)
* adapt to x509 0.13.0 and mirage-crypto-ec 0.10.0 changes (mirleft/ocaml-tls#431 @hannesm)
@hannesm
Copy link
Member Author

hannesm commented Apr 22, 2021

I re-released (force-pushed) to avoid the "missing function client_of_sexp" errors in conduit.

@hannesm
Copy link
Member Author

hannesm commented Apr 22, 2021

failures look unrelated, good to be merged.

@kit-ty-kate
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@kit-ty-kate kit-ty-kate merged commit 6ff9ee3 into ocaml:master Apr 22, 2021
@hannesm hannesm deleted the release-tls-0.13.1 branch April 22, 2021 17:59
@camelus
Copy link
Contributor

camelus commented Apr 22, 2021

Commit: 9b3aee8

A pull request by opam-seasoned @hannesm.

☀️ All lint checks passed 9b3aee8
  • These packages passed lint tests: paf.0.0.2, tls-mirage.0.13.1, tls.0.13.1

☀️ Installability check (+2)
  • new installable packages (2): tls.0.13.1 tls-mirage.0.13.1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants