Update Limitations to match current spec

[jamesnw]

Description

1. Updates the Limitations section in README against the spec as of March. https://www.w3.org/TR/css-anchor-position-1
2. Adds Status note to Demo, and deprecation notice on @position-fallback example.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for anchor-polyfill ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	edd5b5c
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/anchor-polyfill/deploys/6643cfaf6635a500082b11f2
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-177--anchor-polyfill.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for anchor-position-wpt canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	edd5b5c
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/anchor-position-wpt/deploys/6643cfafcd621c00084a13be

[jamesnw]

There were also some additions to the spec that may impact the polyfill logic in some way.

1. New section on "anchor relevance".
2. In creating an anchor, new specification that Pseudo elements have same implicit anchor as originating element unless otherwise specified.
3. New requirements for acceptable anchor points:
   1. el is either an element, or a [pseudo-element (https://www.w3.org/TR/selectors-4/#pseudo-element) that acts like one.
   2. el is not in the skipped contents of another element.
4. Anchor function validity- adds new requirement that there be a target element.

I also chose to mirror what the Container Query polyfill did, and specify that we will not polyfill the JS APIs.

[SondraE]

@jamesnw Let's link people to the GH sponsor page instead of the Open Collective page. We are planning to add a specific goal for Anchor Positioning funding on the GH sponsor page. Seems like it may be a good idea to add that goal to this spec demo whenever we have that on GH.
https://github.com/sponsors/oddbird