-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 260
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] Duplicate/clashing ports used in FVT #6450
Comments
Dups are in
Fixing |
There are far more clashes in the poms -- many are using 10446. Will fix those too... |
Signed-off-by: Nigel Jones <nigel.l.jones+git@gmail.com>
I found quite a few discrepancies - I wonder how the gradle FVTs ever worked (the initial set were fine, the issue arose as more tests were added) as some of the modules recently added were all over the place including discovery & community. This could quite easily lead to a server 'going away' whilst a test was running (since that other test has finished) or possibly assets not being found in an expected state due to other concurrent activity. The intent of the tests was always to keep the isolation between them. For now I've ensured they are all consistent and unique, and added a top level README with the current allocations. Can't be sure this is the cause of intermittent failures, but it's quite possible, and needed fixing anyway Some refactoring (already done in glossary author & data engine) could help clarify- at least reducing duplication within a module, but even better would be to
however I've not done further refactoring at this point |
Is there an existing issue for this?
Current Behavior
Some FVTs are failing.
One possible cause is that the same ports are used for different tests. This only affects gradle by default, since tests are run in parallel.
Expected Behavior
No duplicate ports should be used
Steps To Reproduce
See https://github.com/odpi/egeria/actions/runs/2232481822
and https://github.com/odpi/egeria/actions/runs/2227325114
This may not be the cause of those failures, but it is a latent problem noticed during inspection and should be fixed
Environment
Any Further Information?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: