Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix issue where piping from indexer to replay when daemon was not run… #489

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2018

Conversation

machawk1
Copy link
Member

…ning would still use sample data.

Closes #487

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 10, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #489 into master will increase coverage by 0.64%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #489      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   23.34%   23.98%   +0.64%     
==========================================
  Files           6        6              
  Lines        1135     1138       +3     
  Branches      172      173       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits          265      273       +8     
+ Misses        853      848       -5     
  Partials       17       17
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
ipwb/__main__.py 0% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
ipwb/indexer.py 58.14% <0%> (+3.52%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a4cb792...0a9aac5. Read the comment docs.

@machawk1 machawk1 merged commit 1013550 into master Aug 10, 2018
@machawk1 machawk1 deleted the issue-487 branch August 10, 2018 01:57
@@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ def checkArgs_replay(args):

if not suppliedIndexParameter and likelyPiping:
cdxjIn = ''.join(sys.stdin.readlines())
if len(cdxjIn) == 0: # Daemon was no running, so nothing was indexed
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"no" => "not"

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the catch, @ibnesayeed!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants