Publish 0.4 specification #97
Conversation
I think two items are good here, because the changes to the multiscales and the hcs spec are unrelated. |
| <td>multiscales: add axes type, units and coordinateTransformations</td> | ||
| </tr> | ||
| <tr> | ||
| <td>0.4.0</td> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd be for combining the two rows.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah, I see @constantinpape was for the opposite. Hmm.... happy to look into it later. (Also need to look into removing the "W3C" in the versioned pages)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't have a strong opinion here. Maybe we could start to introduce sub-points? like
- v0.4
- multiscales: ...
- high-content-screen: ...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
FWIW, I am not the biggest fan of the double row either but I was hoping someone would come with an authoritative suggestion 😄
In the absence of a strong consensus, I'd be inclined to not delay the publication of the spec and capture this as an issue to investigate. We will certainly face similar cases in the future and it would be good not to be constrained in terms of what we want to document.
See #86.
Follows the release steps mentioned in https://github.com/ome/ngff#release-process.
Happy to take suggestions on the wording and the rendering of the version history block. Previously we had one item per version but there were more changes in 0.4.0
See http://api.csswg.org/bikeshed/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sbesson/ngff/0.4_publication/0.4/index.bs for a rendered version of the page