This repository contains the ArgRewrite V.2 corpus. ArgRewrite project evaluates the viability of revision as a pedagogical technique by determining whether student interactions with an NLP-based revision assistant enables them to learn to write better -- that is, whether certain forms of the feedback (in terms of the perceived purposes and scopes of changes) encourage students to learn to make more effective revisions. Please refer to ArgRewrite Website for more details.
The following paper discusses the design, collection and annotation process of the ArgRewrite V.2 corpus:
Kashefi, O., Afrin, T., Dale, M., Olshefski, C., Godley, A., Litman, D., & Hwa, R. (2022). ArgRewrite V.2: an annotated argumentative revisions corpus. Language Resources & Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-021-09567-z
The following article discusses the interface we used to collect ArgRewrite:
Afrin, T., Kashefi, O., Olshefski, C., Litman, D., Hwa, R., & Godley, A. (2021). Effective Interfaces for Student-Driven Revision Sessions for Argumentative Writing. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems