[onedpl][ranges] copy_if implementation for sized output #1898
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MikeDvorskiy
force-pushed
the
dev/mdvorski/copy_if_sized_output
branch
2 times, most recently
from
2d47235 to
69df5b4
Compare
MikeDvorskiy
force-pushed
the
dev/mdvorski/copy_if_sized_output
branch
3 times, most recently
from
79bb4a3 to
4072deb
Compare
…MD_EARLYEXIT_REDUCTION
MikeDvorskiy
force-pushed
the
dev/mdvorski/copy_if_sized_output
branch
from
4072deb to
62b82e4
Compare
MikeDvorskiy
force-pushed
the
dev/mdvorski/copy_if_sized_output
branch
from
62b82e4 to
6220472
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The change introduces size limit for an output range support for
copy_ifalgorithm (seq/unseq/par, tbb, omp, serial backends).The change is according to https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p3179r2.html#range_as_output
//TODO: dpcpp backend support
In spite of //TOOD I would ask to start review because there is big amount of non-trivial changes.