Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Helper() method to GinkgoTInterface #585

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bstick12
Copy link

  • This aligns more with the testing.TB interface

This has been requested in

I was also looking for the functionality to use https://github.com/cloudfoundry/libcfbuildpack

* This aligns more with the testing.TB interface
@williammartin
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm not totally sure about this. There is an expectation from tests is that Helper() results in some behaviour around error reporting similar to ExpectWithOffset. That said, we have an equivalent that does nothing in Parallel().

I'd be inclined to merge to help people out but I could imagine it causing confusion in the future.

What do you think @blgm @ansd ?

@jmalloc
Copy link

jmalloc commented Jan 6, 2020

Even if Helper() was a no-op, I too would find this very useful from an integration standpoint.

@jjaferson
Copy link

Hey guys,

Any idea whether this PR is going to get merged?

it would be nice to have GinkgoTInterface compatible with testing.TB even if Helper() is a no-op

@blgm
Copy link
Collaborator

blgm commented Jan 25, 2021

Hi @jjaferson. It looks like this has already been implemented in commit b5fe44d

Ideally this PR would have been closed before, but since the code has already been merged in another PR, I don't think there's much value in keeping it around. Please let me know if there's something I missed.

@blgm blgm closed this Jan 25, 2021
@jjaferson
Copy link

@blgm thanks, I was using an old version of GinkGo I noticed it's been added in 1.14.2.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants