Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using requeue cluster instead of resync lease controller #288

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2022

Conversation

skeeey
Copy link
Member

@skeeey skeeey commented Dec 5, 2022

Signed-off-by: Wei Liu liuweixa@redhat.com

@skeeey
Copy link
Member Author

skeeey commented Dec 5, 2022

refer to open-cluster-management-io/ocm#117

@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ import (

const leaseDurationTimes = 5
const leaseName = "managed-cluster-lease"
const clusterNameLabel = "open-cluster-management.io/cluster-name"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should put all common lables/annotations in the api repo with good documents. Please create an issue in api repo.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

created an issue for this open-cluster-management-io/api#194

@skeeey skeeey changed the title WIP: using requeue cluster instead of resync lease controller Using requeue cluster instead of resync lease controller Dec 7, 2022
@@ -169,3 +195,15 @@ func assertAvailableCondition(managedClusterName string, status metav1.Condition
return nil
}, eventuallyTimeout, eventuallyInterval).ShouldNot(gomega.HaveOccurred())
}

func updateManagedCluster(clusterName string, leaseDuration int32) error {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: updateManagedClusterLeaseDuration

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <liuweixa@redhat.com>
@qiujian16
Copy link
Member

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 8, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: qiujian16, skeeey

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 923cd19 into open-cluster-management-io:main Dec 8, 2022
@skeeey skeeey deleted the lease branch February 2, 2023 02:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants