Replace OneByteChunk with byte array #44
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Having to use the OneByteChunk class can be awkward. Haven't measured it yet, but presume using an array of bytes will be "faster" than copying individual bytes into OneByteChunk instances.
|
Sounds good. Dunno if anyone else relied on the old API; probably not. |
|
Ya true. I used the onebytechunk api in a couple apps of mine. Aside from the breakage when I update, the new api will be appreciated. It changes about 4 lines into one in a few places. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Having to use the OneByteChunk class can be awkward.
Haven't measured it yet, but presume using an array of bytes will be
"faster" than copying individual bytes into OneByteChunk instances.