Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jsr310 to v2.16.0 #539

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 16, 2023

Mend Renovate logo banner

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jsr310 2.15.3 -> 2.16.0 age adoption passing confidence

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner November 16, 2023 01:48
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) November 16, 2023 01:48
auto-merge was automatically disabled November 16, 2023 04:40

Pull Request is not mergeable

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype-jackson-datatype-jsr310-2.x branch from 9ed8c8f to a864780 Compare November 16, 2023 04:41
@thomaspoignant thomaspoignant merged commit 30602a1 into main Nov 16, 2023
5 checks passed
@thomaspoignant thomaspoignant deleted the renovate/com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype-jackson-datatype-jsr310-2.x branch November 16, 2023 06:40
DBlanchard88 pushed a commit to DBlanchard88/java-sdk-contrib that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
…ure#539)

Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant