Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: javadoc and tests for api, context #942

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

toddbaert
Copy link
Member

@toddbaert toddbaert commented May 17, 2024

This PR contains no functional changes, it:

  • adds specific test for API context
  • cleans up general merging test by using spy
  • adds missing javadocs on API

fixes: #939

⚠️ Please don't merge before #934 so we can avoid some conflicts.

@toddbaert toddbaert requested a review from a team as a code owner May 17, 2024 14:54
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.27%. Comparing base (a0b1d25) to head (d406218).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #942      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     95.04%   95.27%   +0.22%     
- Complexity      392      393       +1     
============================================
  Files            38       38              
  Lines           888      888              
  Branches         54       54              
============================================
+ Hits            844      846       +2     
+ Misses           24       23       -1     
+ Partials         20       19       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 95.27% <ø> (+0.22%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

assertEquals("4", merged.getValue("common5").asString(), "invocation merge is incorrect");
assertEquals("4", merged.getValue("common6").asString(), "invocation merge is incorrect");

c.getBooleanValue("key", false, invocationCtx);
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

instead of the specific "getMergedContext" method, I simply used a spy here.

@@ -17,18 +15,13 @@ public DoSomethingProvider(ImmutableMetadata flagMetadata) {
this.flagMetadata = flagMetadata;
}

EvaluationContext getMergedContext() {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This method is no longer needed, spies work better.

Copy link
Contributor

@Kavindu-Dodan Kavindu-Dodan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice set of improvements

Please see this to avoid conflicts in documentation

@toddbaert toddbaert marked this pull request as draft May 17, 2024 15:30
@Kavindu-Dodan Kavindu-Dodan added this to the 1.8.1 milestone May 24, 2024
@Kavindu-Dodan
Copy link
Contributor

@toddbaert I think this can be rebased an considered for 1.8.1 release :)

Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <todd.baert@dynatrace.com>
@toddbaert toddbaert marked this pull request as ready for review June 14, 2024 14:06
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <todd.baert@dynatrace.com>
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jun 14, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@toddbaert toddbaert merged commit 4126b51 into main Jun 14, 2024
10 checks passed
@toddbaert toddbaert deleted the chore/more-tests-and-doc branch June 14, 2024 14:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[FEATURE] Evaluation Context behavior is suprising
3 participants