chore(main): release openfeature-hooks-opentelemetry 0.1.1

[github-actions]

🤖 I have created a release beep boop

0.1.1 (2024-03-11)

📚 Documentation

• update OpenTelemetry hook README (#49) (02157f4)

🔄 Refactoring

• move OTel hooks to openfeature.contrib.hook (#64) (7075656)

---

This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.

[federicobond]

Last minute check: so we want to put our hooks under opentelemetry.contrib.hooks or opentelemetry.contrib.hook?

[beeme1mr]

Last minute check: so we want to put our hooks under opentelemetry.contrib.hooks or opentelemetry.contrib.hook?

I think hooks plural is fine this this case. That's in line with the JS OTel hook. We did this because the hook bundled a trace hook and a metrics hook in the same artifact.

FYI @toddbaert

[federicobond]

That's indeed a good reason for keeping the PyPI package name as openfeature-hooks-opentelemetry. I liked the symmetry between the openfeature.hook and openfeature.contrib.hook namespaces though, matching something we already do with providers, where built-in providers are in openfeature.provider and contrib providers are in openfeature.contrib.provider.

[toddbaert]

That's indeed a good reason for keeping the PyPI package name as openfeature-hooks-opentelemetry. I liked the symmetry between the openfeature.hook and openfeature.contrib.hook namespaces though, matching something we already do with providers, where built-in providers are in openfeature.provider and contrib providers are in openfeature.contrib.provider.

There was some discussion in the .NET contribs about removing the .contibs segment from the namespace, which we might want to consider, but I think either route is fine, and since nothing is 1.0, can be changed later if we really regret it.

[federicobond]

Not sure why it has not triggered the build for sast 🤔

[gruebel]

Not sure why it has not triggered the build for sast 🤔

yeah, definitely strange...

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.05%. Comparing base (d8e10c7) to head (76b659f).
Report is 17 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #53      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.55%   93.05%   +2.50%     
==========================================
  Files           8        9       +1     
  Lines         180      216      +36     
==========================================
+ Hits          163      201      +38     
+ Misses         17       15       -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	93.05% <ø> (+2.50%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

🤖 Release is at https://github.com/open-feature/python-sdk-contrib/releases/tag/openfeature-hooks-opentelemetry/v0.1.1 🌻