Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

GEN-2237: Added index on timestamp field for reindex #19101

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2024
Merged

GEN-2237: Added index on timestamp field for reindex #19101

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2024

Conversation

TeddyCr
Copy link
Contributor

@TeddyCr TeddyCr commented Dec 16, 2024

Describe your changes:

  • Added index on timestamp DESC for test case result for reindex operation

Type of change:

  • Bug fix
  • Improvement
  • New feature
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • My PR title is Fixes <issue-number>: <short explanation>
  • I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • For JSON Schema changes: I updated the migration scripts or explained why it is not needed.

Improvement

  • I have added tests around the new logic.
  • For connector/ingestion changes: I updated the documentation.

@TeddyCr TeddyCr requested a review from a team December 16, 2024 16:05
@github-actions github-actions bot added Ingestion safe to test Add this label to run secure Github workflows on PRs labels Dec 16, 2024
@TeddyCr TeddyCr merged commit bd68d95 into open-metadata:main Dec 16, 2024
20 of 24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@harshach harshach harshach approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
backend data quality Ingestion safe to test Add this label to run secure Github workflows on PRs
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@TeddyCr @harshach