Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fix] Enhance the compatibility of training stylegan 2 #2694

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 25, 2023

Conversation

HAOCHENYE
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for your contribution and we appreciate it a lot. The following instructions would make your pull request more healthy and more easily get feedback. If you do not understand some items, don't worry, just make the pull request and seek help from maintainers.

Motivation

PyTorch consolidated convolution backward API in PR. It means users cannot train styegan2 with PyTorch version higher than 1.10.1

This PR enhances the compatibility of the code referring to the discussion

Resolve #3

Modification

Please briefly describe what modification is made in this PR.

BC-breaking (Optional)

Does the modification introduce changes that break the backward-compatibility of the downstream repositories?
If so, please describe how it breaks the compatibility and how the downstream projects should modify their code to keep compatibility with this PR.

Use cases (Optional)

If this PR introduces a new feature, it is better to list some use cases here, and update the documentation.

Checklist

Before PR:

  • I have read and followed the workflow indicated in the CONTRIBUTING.md to create this PR.
  • Pre-commit or linting tools indicated in CONTRIBUTING.md are used to fix the potential lint issues.
  • Bug fixes are covered by unit tests, the case that causes the bug should be added in the unit tests.
  • New functionalities are covered by complete unit tests. If not, please add more unit test to ensure the correctness.
  • The documentation has been modified accordingly, including docstring or example tutorials.

After PR:

  • If the modification has potential influence on downstream or other related projects, this PR should be tested with some of those projects, like MMDet or MMCls.
  • CLA has been signed and all committers have signed the CLA in this PR.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 22, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 30.00% and project coverage change: -0.03 ⚠️

Comparison is base (5a45fac) 65.41% compared to head (7ca44d8) 65.39%.

❗ Current head 7ca44d8 differs from pull request most recent head 0390d18. Consider uploading reports for the commit 0390d18 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              2.x    #2694      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.41%   65.39%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         128      128              
  Lines        8533     8538       +5     
  Branches     1218     1221       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         5582     5583       +1     
- Misses       2742     2746       +4     
  Partials      209      209              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 65.39% <30.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
mmcv/ops/conv2d_gradfix.py 17.55% <12.50%> (+0.09%) ⬆️
mmcv/ops/deform_conv.py 66.66% <100.00%> (ø)
mmcv/ops/modulated_deform_conv.py 65.18% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@zhouzaida zhouzaida merged commit 5b0cdcc into open-mmlab:2.x Mar 25, 2023
tyomj pushed a commit to tyomj/mmcv that referenced this pull request May 8, 2023
* [Fix] Enhance the compatibility of training stylegan 2

* Fix unit test in PyTorch 2.0

* Apply suggestions from code review

---------

Co-authored-by: Zaida Zhou <58739961+zhouzaida@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants