-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add an optional "fieldOwner" field to set when injecting the caBundle #118
Conversation
When using the cert-rotator with CI/CD systems such as argoCD, the injection of the caBundle makes the cd system to reconcile it again. By setting the field owner, we instruct the cd system that the field is managed by an external component so it will ignore those updates. Signed-off-by: Federico Paolinelli <fpaoline@redhat.com>
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #118 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 56.33% 56.71% +0.38%
==========================================
Files 1 1
Lines 568 573 +5
==========================================
+ Hits 320 325 +5
Misses 183 183
Partials 65 65
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Signed-off-by: Federico Paolinelli <fpaoline@redhat.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Looks like we're getting server-side-apply friendly?
Yep, I am not exactly sure on how it works. My first attempt was to convert the apply to patch, but the same option works with apply. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thank you! lgtm
When using the cert-rotator with CI/CD systems such as argoCD, the injection of the caBundle makes the cd system to reconcile it again. By setting the field owner, we instruct the cd system that the field is managed by an external component so it will ignore those updates.
This was raised in MetalLB in metallb/metallb#1681