Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OPA docs should provide pronunciation of "rego" #2106

Closed
teq0 opened this issue Feb 14, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #2108
Closed

OPA docs should provide pronunciation of "rego" #2106

teq0 opened this issue Feb 14, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #2108

Comments

@teq0
Copy link
Contributor

teq0 commented Feb 14, 2020

The current documentation provides the standard pronunciation of "OPA", it should also provide the standard pronunciation of "rego".

@teq0
Copy link
Contributor Author

teq0 commented Feb 14, 2020

Which is "ray-go", obviously.

tsandall added a commit to tsandall/opa that referenced this issue Feb 14, 2020
...for our friends down under like @teq0.

Fixes open-policy-agent#2106

Signed-off-by: Torin Sandall <torinsandall@gmail.com>
tsandall added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2020
...for our friends down under like @teq0.

Fixes #2106

Signed-off-by: Torin Sandall <torinsandall@gmail.com>
@pyzenberg
Copy link

Which is "ray-go", obviously.

Obviously how? I mean in which language and do we all have enough time to get to know the language you want?

@anderseknert
Copy link
Member

@pyzenberg feel free to pronounce it any way you wish :) FWIW I commonly pronounce the "e" the same way as "Lego", as that sounds natural in Scandinavian languages, saving the "ray-go" pronounciation for when I try to blend in with a north American audience 😄

@teq0
Copy link
Contributor Author

teq0 commented Feb 11, 2022

I'm going to defer to Torin on this one :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants