-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ASP.NET] Update enrich callbacks #940
Closed
vishweshbankwar
wants to merge
8
commits into
open-telemetry:main
from
vishweshbankwar:vibankwa/update-enrich-aspnet
Closed
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c13bcf2
Update enrich callbacks
vishweshbankwar cab28dc
todo
vishweshbankwar b6e74e9
Update src/OpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.AspNet/CHANGELOG.md
vishweshbankwar 388a5f6
Merge branch 'main' into vibankwa/update-enrich-aspnet
Kielek 9e5b0e6
Merge branch 'main' into vibankwa/update-enrich-aspnet
vishweshbankwar 7500277
Merge branch 'main' into vibankwa/update-enrich-aspnet
cijothomas 4c6efcc
Merge branch 'main' into vibankwa/update-enrich-aspnet
vishweshbankwar b5db90d
Merge branch 'main' into vibankwa/update-enrich-aspnet
vishweshbankwar File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
8 changes: 6 additions & 2 deletions
8
src/OpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.AspNet/.publicApi/net462/PublicAPI.Unshipped.txt
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Random idea. Since we are making this change...
Should we consider switching to
HttpContext
or adding it to the signature?Action<Activity, HttpContext>
or
Action<Activity, HttpContext, HttpRequest>
I seem to remember users asking for that way back. Off the top of my head the nice thing
HttpContext
gives you is the items bag so you can easily push stuff into your telemetry.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if we pass in the Context, we could get rid of request. And if we do this, do we also change ASP.NET Core to match this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ya if you want to keep a single delegate we could probably get away with just
Action<Activity, string, HttpContext, Exception?>
. We could also introduce a contract that is expandable like...We could. Less of an issue there though because the ASP.NET Core request & response objects have a property that link back to the HttpContext. I kind of like that design with a dedicated delegate + arguments struct it feels cleaner? 🤷