-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace recordingSpan attributes implementation with slice of attributes #2576
Merged
MrAlias
merged 15 commits into
open-telemetry:main
from
MrAlias:recordingSpan-attrs-slice
Feb 7, 2022
Merged
Replace recordingSpan attributes implementation with slice of attributes #2576
MrAlias
merged 15 commits into
open-telemetry:main
from
MrAlias:recordingSpan-attrs-slice
Feb 7, 2022
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Instead of an LRU strategy for cap-ing span attributes, comply with the specification and drop last added. To do this, the attributesmap is replaced with a slice of attributes.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2576 +/- ##
=======================================
+ Coverage 76.0% 76.2% +0.1%
=======================================
Files 174 173 -1
Lines 12214 12229 +15
=======================================
+ Hits 9292 9319 +27
+ Misses 2677 2667 -10
+ Partials 245 243 -2
|
Unify duplicated code. Fix deduplication algorithm. Fix droppedAttributes to always be returned, even if the span has no attributes.
MrAlias
requested review from
Aneurysm9,
dashpole,
evantorrie,
jmacd,
MadVikingGod,
paivagustavo,
pellared and
XSAM
as code owners
February 3, 2022 22:05
Here is a benchmark showing the comparison between main, #2555, and this PR
|
Aneurysm9
approved these changes
Feb 4, 2022
Co-authored-by: Anthony Mirabella <a9@aneurysm9.com>
jmacd
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💯
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an alternate implementation to #2555. It is preferred to that PR because it realizes similar gains but maintains the order of attributes (in the order the user added them).
Instead of an LRU strategy for cap-ing span attributes, comply with the specification and drop last added. To do this, the attributesmap is replaced with a slice of attributes.
Testing performance comparison
This looks to have considerable memory and allocation reduction and faster computations when compared to
main
.