-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 867
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release stable version of opentelemetry-instrumentation-api #2892
Comments
I realized, another gate on a stable release of the opentelemetry-instrumentation-api is a stable release of the semantic conventions |
Something else to consider is whether to wait for otel-wide spec of "instrumentation api" (discussion at open-telemetry/oteps#165) |
Just a thought that occurred to me: we could mark the packages that depend on semantic conventions ( |
Or just have all attributes extractor in a separate unstable module |
But anyway I totally support the idea of somehow making possible to declare stable a subset of a module |
We've already introduced |
Is it correct to follow the backlog in https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java-instrumentation/projects/10#card-70538476 to know what tasks are left to do before opentelemetry-instrumentation-api can go GA? |
@ThomasVitale yes |
for those watching this issue, we are planning for the next release of the opentelemetry-instrumentation-api (1.17.0) to be a Release Candidate |
This is a tracking issue for releasing stable version of the
opentelemetry-instrumentation-api
artifact.Will post updates from time to time on this issue for anyone who wants to watch/follow it.
You may also be interested in following #2713 which is the current major work in progress towards this goal.
In the meantime, if you require a stable artifact, we recommend using
opentelemetry-api
directly, or shadingopentelemetry-instrumentation-api
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: