-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 635
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Converted TextMap propagator getter to a class and added keys method #1196
Merged
Merged
Changes from 14 commits
Commits
Show all changes
21 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ee81915
converted textmap propagator getter to a class and added keys method
nprajilesh 16ac274
updated the Getter class with default get and keys method
nprajilesh b0de4f8
resolving merge conflicts with master
nprajilesh 1e417a8
changing the getter function with getter objects in instrumentation
nprajilesh cbbc5ef
updating type names
nprajilesh 75c228e
resolving conflicts
nprajilesh a797533
using DictGetter and HelperGetter for Getter Implementation of textmap
nprajilesh b12b997
merge master
nprajilesh 2d18ab9
updated tests + fixed linting issues
nprajilesh 3a78314
updated DictGetter implementation of TextMap
nprajilesh f3afa1f
added textMap.DictGetter in nitpick_ignore
nprajilesh 7c3a32c
adding Iterable to DefaultDict of TextMap
nprajilesh 136eac6
updated the get arguments as per the spec
nprajilesh 70ad767
Merge branch 'master' into text-map-keys
lzchen b64f353
merging master
nprajilesh 54f3da0
Merge branch 'text-map-keys' of https://github.com/nprajilesh/opentel…
nprajilesh 22be108
Merge branch 'master' into text-map-keys
89393f1
Merge branch 'master' into text-map-keys
lzchen d513961
fix a a bad merge conflict resolution
codeboten 75cc9f1
Merge branch 'master' into text-map-keys
01cfa86
Merge branch 'master' into text-map-keys
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't these be extending from
Getter
instead ofDictGetter
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lzchen Extending DictGetter because of the following reasons:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea, this getter is more of a specialized implementation of a dict getter so LGTM.