Support reserving the namespace without specifying any attributes #1197
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
schema
Semantic Conventions schema definition
tooling
Regarding build, workflows, build-tools, ...
Comments
lmolkova
added
tooling
3 tasks
CodeBlanch
pushed a commit
to CodeBlanch/semantic-conventions
that referenced
this issue
Aug 16, 2024
…etry#1197) This topic has come up at least 3 times now. I believe a clarification is warranted. The clarification is aligned with previous recommendations: open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#789 (comment) open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#882 (comment) open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#1194 (comment)
CodeBlanch
pushed a commit
to CodeBlanch/semantic-conventions
that referenced
this issue
Aug 16, 2024
…etry#1197) This topic has come up at least 3 times now. I believe a clarification is warranted. The clarification is aligned with previous recommendations: open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#789 (comment) open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#882 (comment) open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#1194 (comment)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
#1188 (comment)
There were similar attempts to reserve the namespace in the past and we should allow it.
It could also help with things like #713 (e.g. I want to add
db.system=foo, this effectively means thatdb.foo.*namespace is reserved for attributes specific to this database)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: