Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

runc run/exec: ignore SIGURG #3368

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2022
Merged

Conversation

kolyshkin
Copy link
Contributor

Foreground runc exec and runc run forwards all the signals (that it can)
to the process being run.

Since Go 1.14, go runtime uses SIGURG for async preemptive scheduling.
This means that runc regularly receives SIGURG and, in case of
foreground runc run/exec, it gets forwarded to the container process.

For example:

[kir@kir-rhat runc]$ sudo ./runc --debug exec xx67 sleep 1m
...
DEBU[0000] child process in init()
DEBU[0000] setns_init: about to exec
DEBU[0000]signals.go:102 main.(*signalHandler).forward() sending signal to process urgent I/O condition
DEBU[0000]signals.go:102 main.(*signalHandler).forward() sending signal to process urgent I/O condition
DEBU[0000]signals.go:102 main.(*signalHandler).forward() sending signal to process urgent I/O condition
...

Or, with slightly better debug messages from commit 58c1ff3:

DEBU[0000]signals.go:102 main.(*signalHandler).forward() forwarding SIGURG to 819784
DEBU[0000]signals.go:102 main.(*signalHandler).forward() forwarding SIGURG to 819784

Obviously, this signal is an internal implementation detail of Go
runtime, and should not be forwarded to the container process.

Fixes: #3364

Foreground runc exec and runc run forwards all the signals (that it can)
to the process being run.

Since Go 1.14, go runtime uses SIGURG for async preemptive scheduling.
This means that runc regularly receives SIGURG and, in case of
foreground runc run/exec, it gets forwarded to the container process.

For example:

[kir@kir-rhat runc]$ sudo ./runc --debug exec xx67 sleep 1m
...
DEBU[0000] child process in init()
DEBU[0000] setns_init: about to exec
DEBU[0000]signals.go:102 main.(*signalHandler).forward() sending signal to process urgent I/O condition
DEBU[0000]signals.go:102 main.(*signalHandler).forward() sending signal to process urgent I/O condition
DEBU[0000]signals.go:102 main.(*signalHandler).forward() sending signal to process urgent I/O condition
...

Or, with slightly better debug messages from commit 58c1ff3:

DEBU[0000]signals.go:102 main.(*signalHandler).forward() forwarding SIGURG to 819784
DEBU[0000]signals.go:102 main.(*signalHandler).forward() forwarding SIGURG to 819784

Obviously, this signal is an internal implementation detail of Go
runtime, and should not be forwarded to the container process.

Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@cpuguy83 cpuguy83 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda added go Pull requests that update Go code impact/changelog labels Feb 8, 2022
Copy link
Member

@thaJeztah thaJeztah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@thaJeztah thaJeztah merged commit 4318644 into opencontainers:main Feb 8, 2022
@cyphar cyphar mentioned this pull request Mar 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
go Pull requests that update Go code impact/changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[RFC] should we forward SIGURG?
5 participants