Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ReadMe: Update content to match print order #337

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2016

Conversation

vbatts
Copy link
Member

@vbatts vbatts commented Mar 9, 2016

Update the Table of Contents section of the ReadMe.md to match the order
of the merged MarkDown files in the printable HTML and PDF outputs

Signed-off-by: Rob Dolin RobDolin@microsoft.com
Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts vbatts@hashbangbash.com

Update the Table of Contents section of the ReadMe.md to match the order
of the merged MarkDown files in the printable HTML and PDF outputs

Signed-off-by: Rob Dolin <RobDolin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts <vbatts@hashbangbash.com>
@wking
Copy link
Contributor

wking commented Mar 9, 2016 via email

@mrunalp
Copy link
Contributor

mrunalp commented Mar 9, 2016

LGTM

1 similar comment
@crosbymichael
Copy link
Member

LGTM

crosbymichael added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2016
ReadMe: Update content to match print order
@crosbymichael crosbymichael merged commit dfd71f7 into opencontainers:master Mar 10, 2016
@wking wking mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2016
@vbatts vbatts deleted the carry-335 branch April 12, 2016 03:50
wking added a commit to wking/oci-project-template that referenced this pull request May 19, 2016
For runtime-spec, there are often PRs that pickup and reroll another
user's commits (e.g. opencontainers/runtime-spec#337). As long as the
Signed-off-by entries are there (for the DCO) and the new PR
references the earlier work (to avoid maintainer confusion), I see no
problem with this sort of collaboration.

I thought about replacing the old wording with words like the above
paragraph, but it seemed overly prescriptive.

Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
wking added a commit to wking/oci-project-template that referenced this pull request May 23, 2016
For runtime-spec, there are often PRs that pickup and reroll another
user's commits (e.g. opencontainers/runtime-spec#337). As long as the
Signed-off-by entries are there (for the DCO) and the new PR
references the earlier work (to avoid maintainer confusion), I see no
problem with this sort of collaboration.

I thought about replacing the old wording with words like the above
paragraph, but it seemed overly prescriptive.

Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants